Showing posts with label rotten tomatoes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rotten tomatoes. Show all posts

Tuesday, 8 February 2011

The Tourist: Review of a Terrible Film

If I were on my death bed today, racked with the effort to breathe as I wiped the bloodied phlegm from my dry, parched lips, I would clasp your hand in mine, look deep into your eyes and say "Whatever you do in life... promise me one thing... don't watch The Tourist."


It is a film that tried so hard to be a classic that it has become a classic rotten tomato; a film to be sneered and tittered at in general discussions about the worst films you have seen recently. "Just what were they thinking?" becomes a typical phrase during the discussion... and gives you pause for thought. Just what were Johnny Depp: Burton's quirky golden boy and all round brilliant actor, and  Angelina Jolie: sex goddess with the ability to be excellent (albeit a little shouty) thinking? Maybe it was a movie that looked good on paper. Maybe the foreign locations and mistaken identity / not mistaken identity / is he isn't he? storyline looked like the sort of movie that would go down in the ages as a modern champion to mingle with the golden greats. Except it didn't. It bombed.


"Three double cheeseburgers, one large fries and a chocolate milkshake, thanks."

The Tourist is the story of Elise (Jolie) and Frank (Depp) and their meeting on a train to Venice. Elise is being followed by Scotland Yard who are after her lover Alexander who has evaded tax payments and owes a gangster millions. She is given specific instructions to get on a train to Venice by Alexander and to pick someone out who has the same build and height as him as a way to fool the police. Except, oops! One of the police officers is a bit dodgy and passes on Frank's photo to the mob. Cue lots of running around, jumping off buildings, shoot outs on boats and so on. Frank is told he is part of a plan to save Alexander, but his attraction to Elise won't let him leave her and he frequently gets in the way of undercover operations, much to the chagrin of the police. Eventually the mob catches up with Elise, who it turns out is part of the police force, and her life is put in danger as she is forced to open Alexander's safe. Frank goes in to distract the mob while the police take aim and shoot the gangsters. The police are told Alexander is by the pier so go arrest him. With Elise and Frank alone, Frank opens the safe and takes out the millions that were in there... leaving a cheque for the money he owes in tax. Yes, Frank was Alexander all along, and the other guy who everyone thought was Alexander was "just a tourist". Quelle surprise. The two set sail on a boat together, with Elise asking "Twenty million dollars worth of plastic surgery and that's the face you choose?" before telling him "It will do." I would have found this moment much more entertaining and the vast amount of money spent on a face more believable if Frank had been played by Mickey Rourke or Sly Stallone.


"Leave it Ange, she 'int werf it."

One of the main problems while watching The Tourist was the strain it put on your ears. There is constant disneyfied, swooping music in the background that makes it seem like Frank and Elise have a full orchestra trailing behind them everywhere they go. Worse still was when Elise burnt the letter she received off Frank and walked away from the scene as the police raced to save evidence. The music went from swoopy to cheesy electro. It was horrid. Another issue is the distinct lack of chemistry between the two main actors. It's Depp and Jolie, two of the most beautiful people in the world! Looking into their eyes is like seeing a sunrise or going on a hot air balloon over Africa for the first time for Christ's sake. If they can't have a fizzle of chemistry then what hope is their for the rest of us? I also found it a massive shame that Maths teacher Frank was downplayed so much by Depp that he was almost invisible. He seemed to bumble through the film like a ghost. And don't get me started on the "high-tech" gadgets used by the police to lazily force the storyline along. It's a shame that The Tourist didn't work out because the Venice setting was beautiful and the actors were beautiful... but the script was one ugly frothy mess that left you feeling very let down at the end. Depp and Jolie, we expected more.

Tuesday, 28 December 2010

10,000 Goofs in 10,000 BC


I could be witty and say there are 10,000 reasons to watch or not to watch this film, but the truth is I can think of only one reason not to... it sucks. It is a bland, made for TV movie that promised more than it gave. "From the Director of Independence Day and The Day After Tomorrow" brags the poster. Really? I was thinking more along the lines of "From the Director of Xena Warrior Princess and Hercules: The Legendary Journeys" judging from the costumes, lazy historical research and weak plot that I had to endure for a whole one hour and forty-nine minutes.


And the winner for best costume brought in the Woolworth's closing down sale goes to...

I would be diplomatic and say "It's not that I hate these fantasy adventure series..." but I do. I really, really do hate them. In fact, I would go so far as to say I hate them as much as I love Jessica Alba, so that's a lot of hate. I was so hugely disappointed with 10,000 BC, a film that -judging from it's poster- I thought would be along the lines of the epic '300' that I couldn't help myself but to look up the factual errors and goofs to see if my suspicions were correct. And, of course, they were. Now, I haven't had a history lesson since 2000 but I was still pretty certain that in 10,000 BC they did not have pyramids in Egypt; they were erected around 2630 BC. Also in the opening scene an extra who sees the blue eyed Evolet (blue eyes were actually a genetic mutation from around 6,000 to 8,000 years ago) says "Jesus" in shock. I should have just turned the DVD player off there and then.


I gave the film a chance though, I mean, it's made by the director of The Day After Tomorrow, Roland Emmerich wouldn't let us down would he? Oh. He does. Repeatedly. And then he scrawls his filthy name over this historical atrocity to get extra sales that the film doesn't deserve.


The film starts with the tribes people living in harmony, but of course this can't last and most of the tribe end up being taken by demon's on horses (even though horses weren't domestically trained for human travel until 4000 BC... OK, OK I'll stop. The other goofs can be seen on IMDB here) and it takes D'leh and a small group of fellow hunters to save the tribe and the love of his life: the beautiful, blue eyed Evolet.

Another gripe I have is the authenticity in casting. Instead of getting Monica Gellar during her reggae phase and covering her in foundation the creators of this film could have gotten a more credible looking actress and given her blue contact lenses. The audience can also tell immediately who the main characters are judging by attractiveness, which shouldn't be relevant for a pre-historic film where everyone should smell, be covered in grime and have brown, rotting teeth. For example, the more Hollywood looking D'leh (played by the handsome Steven Strait) looked more like a model doing Vogue's September magazine on 'Savage Chic' than a pre-historic tribesman.


Authentic...


Not authentic

D'leh and the other mammoth hunters follow the demon's through various countries faster than a NASA space shuttle, battling giant birds, saber-tooth tigers and galloping mammoths along the way. They survive these feats and join other tribes people whose people have also been kidnapped into slavery. They create a small army, take on the demon's who are sacrificing their slaves, and save everyone in a typical Hollywood ending.


D'leh: "Please don't kill me Mr. Saber-tooth."

Saber-tooth: "Alright then."

There is more I could say about this film such as "Blossom from Eastenders is in it and she somehow saves Evolet with her tears at the end after Evolet is hit with an arrow." but what is the point in telling you that? It's stupid and a lazy way for the writers to get her to survive:

Writer 1: OK we need Evolet to get hurt to cause drama but she can't die because people don't like it when hot girls die. Only for them to be in trouble and then be alright and get their man and live happily ever after.

Writer 2: Right on. So how do we keep everyone happy and make a really great, convincing film at the same time?

Writer 1: Well from what I know of pre historic times (which is fuck all. Clearly) is that the head of the tribe always has magical powers.

Writer 2: No way! That's almost too convenient for words! We are so lucky to have you as a researcher and writer for this film.

Writer 1: What can I say? I'm a genius.

I would suggest watching 10,000 BC if you are more interested in style over substance, or alternatively if you are a big fan of daytime fantasy adventure TV series that are usually on Living or ABC. Otherwise just watch Apocalypto.